Home Contact Biography Works Media News

Jane Recommends
Who Hates Whom / Bob Harris

Who Hates Whom: Well-Armed Fanatics, Intractable Conflicts, and Various Things Blowing Up A Woefully Incomplete Guide by Bob Harris

"The geopolitical equivalent of scorecards that get hawked at ball games. Only Bob could make a user’s guide to our increasingly hostile world this absorbing, this breezy, and—ultimately—this hopeful."
~ Ken Jennings, author of Brainiac

 

Jane in Print
Serenity Found: More Unauthorized Essays on Joss Whedon's Firefly Universe, edited by Jane Espenson

Flirting with Pride and Prejudice: Fresh Perspectives on the Original Chick-Lit Masterpiece, edited by Jennifer Crusie and including Jane Espenson's short story, "Georgiana"

Finding Serenity: Anti-Heroes, Lost Shepherds and Space Hookers in Joss Whedon's Firefly, edited by Jane Espenson and Glenn Yeffeth

 
Jane in DVD

Jane in DVD

Now Available:
+Battlestar Galactica Season 3
+Dinosaurs Seasons 3 & 4
+Gilmore Girls Season 4
+Buffy: The Chosen Collection
+Tru Calling
+Firefly
+Angel: Limited Edition Collectors Set

Jane in Progress

 

Home » Archives » February 2007 » After All, What's Better For Friendship Than a Pop Quiz?
[Previous entry: "Meredith is the Drunk One -- You Know the One I Mean"] [Next entry: "Psst... It's Not Really an Old Saying"]

02/07/2007: After All, What's Better For Friendship Than a Pop Quiz?


When you've finished a draft of your spec script, you give it to friends to read, right? And then you wait for their reaction, as if you're being tested. Well, you are, kind of. But here's something interesting -- you're also testing your friends.

You're going to need input over your spec-writing career and beyond. Writers often -- almost always -- have friends read drafts before they submit them, even once they've got well-established careers. And they know *which* friends to hand them to because they've paid attention to which ones read carefully, which ones give constructive advice, which ones share their sensibility...

So start paying attention now. If one of your readers likes everything you do, well, that's perfect if what you most need is an ego-boost (which is possible), but it's not great if you really need advice. If another one has confident and specific recommendations but can't answer simple questions about the plot, then maybe they didn't read as carefully as they think they did. Someone else might be good at detecting problems, but might also leave you so demoralized that you lose confidence in your ability to fix them!

If you test your readers a little bit and keep track of them, you not only figure out whose notes work for you, you might even end up with a sort of tool kit of readers: someone who can help you sharpen your jokes, someone else who senses structural problems, and someone else to fluff the ego (it really is important).

Lunch: soup and the "thai crunch salad" from CPK


 

Get Blog Updates Via Email

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

 

Links
Walt Disney Writing Fellowship Program
UC Berkeley
Jane recommends you also visit BobHarris.com

 

Home
Archives

February 2007
SMTWTFS

Valid XHTML 1.0!

Powered By Greymatter
Greymatter Forums


Home | News | Works | Biography | Frequently Asked Questions

Site design Copyright © PM Carlson
This is a fan site owned and operated entirely by PM Carlson with the cooperation and assistance of Jane Espenson. This site is not affiliated in any way with Mutant Enemy, 20th Century Fox or ABC.