Home Contact Biography Works Media News

Jane Recommends
Who Hates Whom / Bob Harris

Who Hates Whom: Well-Armed Fanatics, Intractable Conflicts, and Various Things Blowing Up A Woefully Incomplete Guide by Bob Harris

"The geopolitical equivalent of scorecards that get hawked at ball games. Only Bob could make a user’s guide to our increasingly hostile world this absorbing, this breezy, and—ultimately—this hopeful."
~ Ken Jennings, author of Brainiac


Jane in Print
Serenity Found: More Unauthorized Essays on Joss Whedon's Firefly Universe, edited by Jane Espenson

Flirting with Pride and Prejudice: Fresh Perspectives on the Original Chick-Lit Masterpiece, edited by Jennifer Crusie and including Jane Espenson's short story, "Georgiana"

Finding Serenity: Anti-Heroes, Lost Shepherds and Space Hookers in Joss Whedon's Firefly, edited by Jane Espenson and Glenn Yeffeth

Jane in DVD

Jane in DVD

Now Available:
+Battlestar Galactica Season 3
+Dinosaurs Seasons 3 & 4
+Gilmore Girls Season 4
+Buffy: The Chosen Collection
+Tru Calling
+Angel: Limited Edition Collectors Set

Jane in Progress


Home » Archives » August 2007 » Like Snacks For Your Eyes, Not Your Ears
[Previous entry: "I Taught I Taw a Placement Program!"] [Next entry: "The Mouse House"]

08/07/2007: Like Snacks For Your Eyes, Not Your Ears

Are scripts visual or auditory? Your spec scripts aren't going to be read aloud by actors, but they are going to be read by people who are actively evaluating how they would sound if they were. Reading a script is certainly a more ear-based experience than reading a short story or an essay is. I bet if you did one of those brain scans, all the bits of your brain that have to do with hearing would be all squirmy and lit up while you read a script.

And yet, it's all still just words on a page, and you, as a spec script writer, are in the unique position of being able to use the fact that you KNOW you're writing exclusively for readers, not viewers, to slip a few treats into the script that wouldn't be detectable if it were being read out loud. Little non-auditory gifts.

For example, when I wrote a Buffy script with a troll as a major guest character, I wrote all of his lines in all capital letters. It wasn't really a cue to the actor, who would've bellowed beautifully anyway, as much as it was just me having fun on the page for the benefit of a reader.

In another script, Willow had to comment on the fact that there was more than one Buffy. Instead of having her say "two Buffys?" I wrote "two Buffies?" knowing that Joss -- the script's ultimate reader -- would enjoy that.

Something I'm dying to do, and I can't imagine why I haven't done it already, is to write a British character's dialogue with all British spellings. I think it would be hilarious on the page:

Are you insulting my honor?

Your honour? Certainly not.

Personally, I could even see a writer doing something as nonstandard as having a character very meekly say something in a tiny font. Although I'd only do it once in the script. It's right on the edge of gimmicky, but if a script was really well-written and then had one little whimsical note like that, I'd think it was pretty cocky and cool.

Others will give you different advice on this point, but I say, once your script is great, there's nothing wrong with playing just a little bit like this. Lightly, lightly.

Lunch: antipasto salad


Get Blog Updates Via Email

Enter your Email

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz


Walt Disney Writing Fellowship Program
UC Berkeley
Jane recommends you also visit BobHarris.com



August 2007

Valid XHTML 1.0!

Powered By Greymatter
Greymatter Forums

Home | News | Works | Biography | Frequently Asked Questions

Site design Copyright © PM Carlson
This is a fan site owned and operated entirely by PM Carlson with the cooperation and assistance of Jane Espenson. This site is not affiliated in any way with Mutant Enemy, 20th Century Fox or ABC.